<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Maple Heights City - EdTribune OH - Ohio Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Maple Heights City. Data-driven education journalism for Ohio. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://oh.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Parma&apos;s Absence Rate Fell 22.6 Points and Finished Below Ohio&apos;s Average</title><link>https://oh.edtribune.com/oh/2026-10-09-oh-parma-turnaround/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://oh.edtribune.com/oh/2026-10-09-oh-parma-turnaround/</guid><description>Parma City School District&apos;s published chronic absenteeism rate fell from 46.5% in 2021-22 to 23.9% in 2024-25, a decrease of 22.6 percentage points. By the end of that comparison, Parma was below Ohi...</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/parma-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Parma City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; School District&apos;s published chronic absenteeism rate fell from 46.5% in 2021-22 to 23.9% in 2024-25, a decrease of 22.6 percentage points. By the end of that comparison, Parma was below Ohio&apos;s corresponding statewide rate of 25.1%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The improvement was concentrated in the first year after the high starting rate. Parma&apos;s rate fell to 24.2% in 2022-23, then stood at 23.3% in 2023-24 before rising slightly in 2024-25. These are historical attendance results, not a measure of students&apos; attendance this fall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-10-09-oh-parma-turnaround-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Parma&apos;s published chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A sharp decrease, followed by a smaller range&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The initial decline was 22.3 percentage points. Most of the reduction between the first and last reports therefore occurred between 2021-22 and 2022-23. The subsequent rates stayed below a quarter of students, rather than continuing to fall at the same pace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is a more precise description than a continuous improvement streak. Parma&apos;s rate improved again in 2023-24 and then increased in 2024-25. The latest result still left the district substantially below its starting rate, but the small reversal belongs in the account of what happened.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide rate also declined across the comparison, from 30.2% in 2021-22 to 25.1% in 2024-25. Parma moved from above that statewide rate to below it. In the last published year used here, Parma&apos;s rate was 1.2 percentage points lower than Ohio&apos;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The largest decrease in the qualifying comparison&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Parma had the largest endpoint decrease among the 420 districts meeting the enrollment and data-availability rules shown in the comparison chart. The analysis compares the same districts&apos; first and last published rates and uses their last-year enrollment to determine eligibility. It does not rank schools, or districts without both endpoint rates, alongside them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-10-09-oh-parma-turnaround-improvers.png&quot; alt=&quot;Largest decreases in the qualifying district comparison&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a ranking of decreases, not a ranking of the lowest absence rates. A district can show a large decrease while retaining a comparatively high rate. Parma&apos;s own result also leaves a substantial attendance problem: its final rate was just under a quarter of students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The endpoint ranking cannot explain the change. Attendance initiatives, changes in family circumstances and differences in reporting are questions for district evidence. The state rate series records the results; it does not establish which intervention produced them or how much of the initial decrease reflects circumstances shared across Ohio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Nearby districts followed different paths&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The selected Cuyahoga County comparison shows why it is useful to examine annual rates as well as endpoint changes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/lakewood-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Lakewood City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; moved from 20.6% in 2021-22 to 26.8% in 2024-25. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/south-euclid-lyndhurst-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;South Euclid-Lyndhurst City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; rose from 28.9% to 36.0%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other selected districts improved while finishing above Parma. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/euclid-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Euclid City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; fell from 57.1% to 42.3%, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/maple-heights-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Maple Heights City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; fell from 52.3% to 42.6%. These districts illustrate different paths within the same reporting window; they are not a matched comparison that isolates a Parma policy effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-10-09-oh-parma-turnaround-peers.png&quot; alt=&quot;Parma and selected Cuyahoga County district trends&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the record can establish&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The available state absence series starts in 2021-22. It cannot establish whether Parma or these nearby districts have returned to a pre-pandemic baseline. It also does not turn total district enrollment into a count of students attending regularly; that is a different measure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The supported finding is substantial on its own: Parma&apos;s rate fell sharply, remained well below its starting level in the following reports, and finished below the corresponding Ohio rate. The next useful question is whether the later, smaller fluctuation continues—and what district evidence can explain the initial change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>Cuyahoga County&apos;s 2024-25 Chronic Absence Rates Spanned 50.2 Points</title><link>https://oh.edtribune.com/oh/2026-09-10-oh-cleveland-suburban-divide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://oh.edtribune.com/oh/2026-09-10-oh-cleveland-suburban-divide/</guid><description>&gt; Correction: This article was updated September 11, 2026, to correct its district rates, range, comparison, and supporting evidence.</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Correction: This article was updated September 11, 2026, to correct its district rates, range, comparison, and supporting evidence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cuyahoga County&apos;s 31 school districts reported chronic absenteeism rates from 6.5% to 56.7% in 2024-25, the most recent year in the Ohio attendance panel. The 50.2-point spread is the difference between &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/cuyahoga-heights-local&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Cuyahoga Heights Local&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/garfield-heights-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Garfield Heights City Schools&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. The highest rate was 8.7 times the lowest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The county&apos;s published-enrollment-weighted rate was 32.1%, compared with 25.1% statewide. The district rows behind the county calculation represented 126,151 students. That county average gives useful scale, but it does not describe the range facing individual districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-09-10-oh-cleveland-suburban-divide-spectrum.png&quot; alt=&quot;Cuyahoga County&apos;s chronic absenteeism range by district&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The lower end of the range&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cuyahoga Heights Local reported the county&apos;s lowest rate at 6.5%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/solon-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Solon City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; was next at 7.6%, followed by &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/bay-village-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Bay Village City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 7.8% and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/brecksvillebroadview-heights-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Brecksville-Broadview Heights City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 9.4%. Those rates were below Ohio&apos;s 25.1% statewide figure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The middle of the distribution was broad. Parma City reported 23.9%, just below the state rate. Lakewood City was at 26.8%, while &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/south-euclidlyndhurst-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;South Euclid-Lyndhurst City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; was at 36.0%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/euclid-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Euclid City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/maple-heights-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Maple Heights City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; were higher still, at 42.3% and 42.6%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The upper end included &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/cleveland-municipal&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Cleveland Municipal&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 55.7%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/districts/east-cleveland-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;East Cleveland City School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 53.2% and Garfield Heights City Schools at 56.7%. The numbers show a countywide spread; they do not identify why one district&apos;s rate differs from another&apos;s or imply that a district boundary causes the outcome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-09-10-oh-cleveland-suburban-divide-extremes.png&quot; alt=&quot;Cuyahoga County&apos;s five lowest and five highest district chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;One pair, four reporting years&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap between Solon and Garfield Heights was already large in the first year of the available comparison. In 2021-22, Solon&apos;s rate was 12.6% and Garfield Heights&apos; was 56.9%, a 44.3-point difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By 2024-25, Solon had moved down to 7.6%, a 5.0-point improvement. Garfield Heights was at 56.7%, only 0.2 points below its 2021-22 rate. The difference between the two districts had widened to 49.1 points, up 4.8 points from the earlier comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/oh/img/2026-09-10-oh-cleveland-suburban-divide-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Solon and Garfield Heights chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comparison is descriptive, not a diagnosis. The Ohio attendance data can show where rates were highest, lowest and changing across the reporting panel. It does not include the local information needed to assign a cause to the gap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For district leaders, the practical starting point is the same in every countywide comparison: keep the published denominator visible, compare like reporting years and examine the individual district pattern instead of relying on a single county average. In Cuyahoga County, that pattern runs from 6.5% to 56.7% across 31 districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chronic absenteeism rates and published enrollment denominators come from the &lt;a href=&quot;https://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/download&quot;&gt;Ohio Department of Education and Workforce&apos;s Ohio School Report Card download files&lt;/a&gt;, covering the 2021-22 through 2024-25 school years.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>